They say it’s not the size of your equipment… but maybe it is.
Last weekend I went to a conference. As an experiment I left my laptop and DSLR(s) at home, taking my iPad and Canon S90 instead. I wanted to see how well I could function with the lighter gear. Technically, things went okay, but that’s not what I want to talk about here.
My tiny Canon made it awkward.
It wasn’t awkward from a technical standpoint. I was able to capture most of the shots I wanted. It was awkward socially.
Prior to the conference, I only knew a few others amongst the 300 attendees. While there, I introduced myself to many more. At some point, I noted that I was a photographer… and it felt wrong.
Why? I don’t know. I’m pretty sure that a lot of folks wondered why a pro photographer wasn’t carrying around a DSLR… why was this man who claimed to know all about creating pictures using a tiny pocketable point and shoot without interchangeable lenses. For better or for worse, I didn’t feel confident representing myself as a pro photographer without my big camera, especially when I was surrounded by a bunch of other amateurs packing DSLRs of various sizes.
Is it a legit concern? Should I have brought my DSLR if only for the size factor? I’m curious if this is simply a mental thing that’s absurd for me to feel, or whether there’s a real professional and perception issue that if I want to be taken seriously as a photographer (even when I’m not actually performing photo duties) that I need to always pack the big body/glass.
Was I being judged by the size of my small Canon in my pocket, or was it all in my head? What do you think?
Photo by saeba, used under Creative Commons licensing





